Go read about The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations, as it pertains to Condoleeza Rice’s testimony before the 9/11 witch trials.
The last update to that post (as of time of posting) is from John Rosenburg who considers the article cited to contain bigotry in its first paragraph:
Odd was Alessandra Stanley’s article, “Testimony Provides Breath of Racial Reality for TV.”
According to Ms. Stanley, Rice’s “measured performance brought a breath of reality to a television universe too often clotted with distorted images of black women, ” but for an example of distortion one need look no further than her own lede:
There was absolutely nothing in Condoleezza Rice’s neutral-toned suit, primly folded hands or calm demeanor to draw attention to her sex or race. Her answers, guarded, prosaic and a bit pedantic, were typical of any high-level Washington official.
Ms. Stanley thus is saying that Rice didn’t seem like a black woman because she was not flashy, loud, and dumb.
But she was saying that “flashy, loud, and dumb” is how black women are typically depicted on television. (Damn you, Oprah!) Her contrast was between this television depiction and other television depictions, not with this television depiction and real-life. That much should be obvious from the title.
Via Peoria Pundit, at his new digs.
Update: On closer inspection (actually first thorough inspection since I wrote this having only read the excerpts, that article is odd. What’s up with the following sentence? She got her groove back after a bracing exchange with Mr. Kerrey.
Please.