Wow. Illinois football has been outscored 77-5 over the past two games. Next week, we’re playing Northwestern, ranked 25 in the country this past week, although might sink after losing badly to the Buckeyes today. Not only that, but if this guy’s numbers are to be trusted, the Illini defense broke their previous record of 398 points in a season allowed, set in 2003. With the 37 points we gave up today, we’ve allowed 421 points so far, with another game against a quality opponent yet to play.
How did it get this bad? Seriously, man. We’ve won only one conference game in the past three seasons. (I was there! Saw it with my own eyes!)
More recent news is that the NCAA had rejected Illinois’ appeal against that august body’s claims that Chief Illiniwek is “hostile and offensive.” On the “Chief Issue,” most people fall into one of four camps: some people hate the Chief and want him to go away, some people love the Chief and want him to stay, some people couldn’t care less about the Chief but hate listening to the anti-Chief crowd’s noisemaking enough to want the Chief to go away, and some people couldn’t care less about the Chief but don’t want to see anyone give in to the bully tactics of the anti-Chief crowd (and now the NCAA). I fall into the last category, and most of the people I regularly associate with fall into either the hate-the-Chief or shut-up-the-protesters crowds. Much like the Graduate student unionization, I look at it as a resume-padding operation. The union of grad students will end up doing the school more harm than good, but it gives the class of agitators something neat to put on their resumes: was instrumental in unionizing 13,000 graduate students or however many of us there are. Same thing with the chief. The agitators want to be the ones to accomplish this great thing: contributed to sanitization of cultural landscape/showed some down-state yahoos the error of their ways. I’m not sure how significant the loss of revenue from alumni contributions would be if the administration caved, but it would be something. And the agitators won’t be writing out checks, the University to them will always be racist and patriarchal (or whatever the current dirty words are in the post-modern literature… Imperialist? Colonial?). [Updated: Something else I object to are the chief-critics simultaneous accusations of the Chief being some kind of racist symbol while using expressions like "some white guy." Another one that gets me is when people counter claims that all aboriginals are hostile to schools naming their teams things like "Fighting Illini" or "Fighting Sioux" with polls showing that the opposite is the case, and then the anti-Chief folks will say things like, those people polled weren't adequately educated on the issue. Meaning: they haven't been properly indoctrinated into the victim cult. I suppose that it's inevitable that the Chief is retired for reasons lain out in this paragraph. But retirement is not death, so encourages David Yeagley. (A side note: I tend to be a bit more sympathetic to campaigns to change the names of teams called things like "redskins" or "savages" than Yeagley seems to be.)]
But like I said, it’s not all bad. I did get my lawn mowed today. Had to learn how to tune the carburator, but now the little sucker’s purring fairly nicely.
That and basketball starts in less than a week.
Then again, the Blues really, really suck! There’s always the chance we’ll pull out of this skid tonight against the Nashville Predators, for our first road win and third overall. But I’m not counting on it anymore than a win against Northwestern next weekend.


